The privacy-focused cryptocurrency Monero has suffered a significant disruption, with 60 mined blocks discarded from its blockchain up to now 24 hours amid an ongoing tried 51% assault by the Qubic community.
The Monero Consensus Standing dashboard exhibits Monero noticed 60 orphaned blocks (legitimate blocks that have been rejected) within the final 720 blocks. The disruption comes amid an ongoing financial assault by the Qubic community, incentivizing egocentric mining.
Qubic miners redirect their computing energy to mine Monero (XMR) and promote the proceeds to purchase and burn Qubic tokens, whereas being paid in QUBIC. Qubic miners reportedly earn greater than Monero miners underneath this setup.
The assault has sparked fears of a potential “51% assault” — a uncommon and critical occasion that may let attackers rewrite transactions or block them solely.
An orphaned block is a legitimate block excluded from the primary chain as a result of one other competing block on the similar top was accepted first. In egocentric mining, a miner with vital hashrate withholds blocks and publishes them strategically to overhaul the general public chain, inflicting sincere miners’ work to be discarded.
As of the time of writing, Monero’s worth stands at over $247, down over 8.6% from the worth of over $276 reported 24 hours in the past.
Qubic assault disrupts Monero community
Qubic’s Monero mining pool brazenly engages in egocentric mining, with Qubic founder Sergey Ivancheglo admitting it in an X publish. Ivancheglo claimed in a Tuesday X publish that “Qubic has achieved 51% over Monero” and the workforce is “ready for impartial confirmations.”
Associated: 51% assault on Ethereum tougher than on Bitcoin — Justin Drake
A 51% assault happens when a single entity — on this case, the Qubic mining pool — controls over half of a blockchain community’s mining energy or stake, permitting them to govern transactions. Zhong Chenming, the co-founder of crypto cybersecurity agency SlowMist, mentioned in a Tuesday X publish that “this time the 51% assault on Monero appears to have succeeded.” He added:
“The fee was additionally excessive, and it’s unclear what the financial advantages of doing this are in the long run… In concept, the Qubic mining pool can now rewrite the blockchain, obtain double-spending, and censor any transactions.”
Not everyone seems to be satisfied
Doubts stay round whether or not a profitable 51% assault occurred. Partaking in egocentric mining with management over a excessive proportion of the hashrate that’s wanting the bulk can sometimes result in orphaned blocks.
Monero’s whole hashrate analysis by CoinWarz ends in a 5 GH/s estimation. Unverified information supplied by Qubic claims a peak hashrate of three.01 GH/s, which is greater than enough, and a present hashrate of two.08 GH/s, inadequate for a 51% assault.
The Monero Consensus Standing additionally signifies that the variety of blocks mined by unknown mining swimming pools and solo miners — the class which incorporates Qubic — reached almost 30% on Aug. 11. This might sign Qubic controlling many of the hashrate for a short interval, or controlling a good portion however nonetheless a minority of the hashrate.
SeraiDEX’s lead developer, Luke Parker, raised a problem with studies {that a} 51% assault occurred in a separate X publish. He famous {that a} six-block-deep community reorganization with block orphaning “doesn’t imply a ‘51% assault’ was profitable.”
“It does imply an adversary with a excessive quantity of hash obtained fortunate,” he added.
Associated: Coin Metrics analysis exhibits BTC and ETH are resistant to 51% assaults
Hack battle escalates between networks
Qubic and Monero are locked in an ongoing hack battle, buying and selling countermeasures. Ivancheglo beforehand wrote on X that Monero broke Qubic’s egocentric mining system, prompting his repair. Earlier than that, Ivancheglo accused a developer of Monero mining software program XMRig, Sergei Chernykh, of denial-of-service (DDoS) attackg Qubic’s pool, resulting in hashrate losses — a declare Chernykh disputes.
The assault first began in late July when the group observed what it described as an “financial assault.” The operation makes use of financial incentives — paying Qubic miners greater than Monero miners — in an try and take management over most of Monero’s hashrate and consequently the community.
Niko Demchuk, head of authorized at onchain forensics agency AMLBot, informed Cointelegraph that Qubic’s assault on Monero might be deemed “laptop sabotage” or “unauthorized entry” underneath Belarusian and European Union legal guidelines. Nevertheless, no statute explicitly mentions 51% assaults. Demchuk mentioned Belarus’ cybercrime guidelines may apply if blockchain manipulation disrupts protected programs.
Journal: Bitcoin vs. the quantum laptop risk: Timeline and options (2025–2035)
