FTX’s chapter legal professionals have pushed again forcefully in opposition to a $1.53 billion declare filed by failed crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), calling the demand “illogical” and warning that it might unfairly drain funds from FTX’s reliable collectors.
In new courtroom paperwork submitted on June 20, FTX’s authorized staff requested a Delaware chapter choose to reject 3AC’s whole declare, arguing the buying and selling agency’s alleged losses have been self-inflicted by means of extreme risk-taking and ignored margin calls, not as a result of any misconduct by FTX.
Breaching margin necessities
The dispute facilities on margin trades that 3AC positioned on FTX’s alternate in 2022. On the time, 3AC, which had borrowed closely throughout the crypto sector, tapped a $120 million credit score facility from FTX to fund giant positions.
In keeping with FTX, the hedge fund breached margin necessities in June 2022 after the TerraUSD stablecoin collapse triggered a wider market meltdown.
The alternate added that when it notified 3AC that its account had fallen beneath required collateral thresholds, the agency allegedly failed to reply for greater than six hours and as a substitute withdrew $18 million value of Ethereum (ETH), additional worsening the shortfall, based on the submitting.
Confronted with what it known as an pressing credit score breach, FTX liquidated 3AC’s account, recovering $82 million. FTX’s attorneys preserve this liquidation was not solely contractually allowed but in addition prevented a good bigger gap within the property’s stability sheet.
In keeping with the legal professionals:
“The accounts would’ve been $18 million underwater at FTX’s petition date had the liquidation not occurred. No motion by FTX resulted in any lack of worth, and thus the assertion that 3AC has a declare in opposition to FTX is a fiction.”
‘Unreasonable premise’
The submitting accused 3AC of utilizing “an unreasonable and unsupportable beginning premise” to inflate its authentic $120 million declare greater than 10x.
To help its place, FTX submitted testimony from Steven P. Coverick, managing director at consulting agency Alvarez & Marsal, who reconstructed the trades in query and concluded the pressured sale was justified and essential to stem additional losses.
The property additionally offered an skilled opinion from British Virgin Islands King’s Counsel Stephen Atherton, who dismissed 3AC’s authorized idea beneath BVI regulation as unsound.
FTX’s counsel argued that 3AC’s try and claw again billions is a bid to plug its personal failed liquidation course of and shift blame to FTX’s remaining collectors, who’re nonetheless ready to be repaid after the alternate’s collapse in November 2022.
The legal professionals argued:
“[3AC seeks] to extract worth from the Debtors’ estates on the expense of reliable collectors as a way to salvage their very own failed liquidation proceedings. However FTX collectors mustn’t and can’t function a backstop for 3AC’s failed buying and selling technique.”
The conflict marks the most recent twist within the multi-billion greenback tangle of claims and counterclaims stemming from the dramatic downfall of each crypto corporations.
Below the present schedule, 3AC should file its formal response by July 11, with a non-evidentiary listening to set for August 12 in Delaware. Attorneys for 3AC didn’t instantly reply to requests for touch upon Saturday.
