Bitcoin rebounds above $75,000 after brief slide as thin liquidity keeps traders on edge

Bitcoin BTC$78,358.92 traded back above $76,000 after a short-lived break of support, where it tested $74,000, highlighting the fragile balance between dip buyers and forced sellers in a market still short on “depth.”

The quick V-shaped move stemmed from order book dynamics where liquidity has dried, allowing buy/sell trades to have an outsized impact on the going market rate. This thin market depth allowed a relatively small wave of selling to break the $75,000 support and trigger leverage flushes, but equally shallow offers let dip buyers and short-covering orders lift prices just as quickly.

China, meanwhile, is providing context but not acceleration. A private manufacturing survey for January showed factory activity edging into slight expansion, while the official gauge slipped into contraction, underscoring uneven momentum in the world’s second-largest economy.

Beijing’s tightly managed yuan policy means the country’s influence on bitcoin runs less through direct capital flows and more through global dollar liquidity cycles. Marginally better factory data can ease recession fears at the edges, but without a surge in currency volatility or stimulus-driven liquidity, it, in theory, acts more as a background stabilizer than a catalyst for crypto markets.

The weekend trading window added another layer to BTC’s fragility. With traditional markets closed and large institutional desks largely inactive, order books tend to thin further, reducing the amount of capital required to push prices through key technical levels.

In those conditions, bitcoin often behaves less like a macro asset and more like a leveraged derivative of its own positioning, where funding imbalances and clustered stop orders can dictate direction for hours at a time.

For now, the rebound above the mid-$70,000s suggests the selloff functioned more as a leverage reset than a structural repricing.

Depth remains thin relative to earlier in the cycle, indicating that both downside wicks and upside squeezes can extend farther than fundamentals alone would justify.

Until deeper liquidity returns or macroeconomic drivers, such as dollar strength and real yields, shift more forcefully, bitcoin’s price action is likely to remain driven by positioning and market plumbing rather than by decisive economic catalysts.