2026-01-19 23:15:00
The tariff threat over Greenland sent stocks tumbling and gold soaring—but this time, traders fled from the dollar, not to it.
What’s Happening Between the U.S. and NATO?
Over the weekend, President Trump announced something that caught even seasoned market veterans off guard: the United States would impose tariffs starting at 10% (rising to 25% by June) on eight NATO allies—including major economies like Germany, France, and the United Kingdom—unless they agreed to let the U.S. purchase Greenland, Denmark’s semi-autonomous Arctic territory.
This wasn’t your typical trade dispute over steel quotas or agricultural exports. This was a geopolitical demand wrapped in economic coercion, and global markets opened Monday morning with a collective “wait, what?”
European leaders quickly labeled the move as “blackmail,” with French President Emmanuel Macron calling it “unacceptable.” Denmark’s Prime Minister said Europe “will not be blackmailed.” By Monday’s close, the pan-European Stoxx 600 had tumbled 1.23%, with luxury giants like LVMH dropping 4.7% and automakers like BMW shedding nearly 4%.
But here’s where things got interesting—and educational for new traders: the market reaction to this crisis looked fundamentally different from previous trade tensions. Instead of the playbook we’ve seen before, traders did something unexpected. Let’s break down why.
The “Risk-On/Risk-Off” Framework: Your Market Mood Ring
Before we dive into what made this different, you need to understand a fundamental concept that drives huge portions of market behavior: risk sentiment.
Think of global markets as having two basic modes:
Risk-On: When traders feel optimistic about the economy and geopolitics, they pile into assets that offer higher potential returns but come with more uncertainty. This includes stocks (especially in emerging markets), commodities like oil, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, and higher-yielding currencies like the Australian dollar. The thinking is: “Things look stable, so I can afford to chase bigger gains.”
Risk-Off: When uncertainty spikes—whether from a pandemic, a banking crisis, or unexpected geopolitical tensions—traders rush to protect their capital. They sell those riskier assets and flood into “safe havens” (assets that tend to hold their value or even rise during chaos). Historically, this meant U.S. Treasury bonds, the U.S. dollar, the Japanese yen, the Swiss franc, and gold.
The Greenland tariff threat clearly triggered a risk-off move. But this time, the usual script got flipped.
What Makes a Safe Haven… Safe?
Safe-haven assets typically share certain characteristics: they’re backed by stable governments, have deep and liquid markets (meaning you can easily buy or sell large amounts), and historically maintain or increase value when everything else is falling apart.
The U.S. dollar has dominated this role for decades because America has the world’s largest economy, the deepest financial markets, and—critically—has been perceived as a source of stability rather than instability. When Russia invaded Ukraine in early 2024, traders bought dollars. When COVID-19 hit in 2020, traders bought dollars. When Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008, traders bought dollars.
The logic was simple: regardless of where the crisis originated, the U.S. appeared to be the safest place to park your money during the storm.
But on Monday, January 19, 2026, that logic appeared to have broke down.
The Market Reaction: A Crisis Originating From Washington
Let’s look at how different asset classes responded to Trump’s Greenland ultimatum:
Equities Sold Off Hard
European stocks bore the brunt. The Stoxx 600 dropped, with sectors directly exposed to U.S. trade—like autos and luxury goods—getting hammered. Notable moves from the auto sector (BMW & Volkswagen dropped), and luxury powerhouse LVMH plunged. Even U.S. stock futures (the market was closed Monday for a holiday) pointed lower.
This was textbook risk-off: when uncertainty rises, traders sell stocks because companies’ future earnings become harder to predict.
Gold Surged to Record Highs
Gold, the classic safe haven, jumped more than 1.5% to an all-time high above $4,660 per ounce. This made perfect sense—when traders get scared, they buy gold. The yellow metal has been on an absolute tear, up nearly 8% in January alone after gaining 64% in 2025. Gold doesn’t pay interest, doesn’t generate profits, but it tends to hold value when everything else is crumbling.
So far, this all tracks with normal risk-off behavior.
Bitcoin Dumped
Cryptocurrencies got crushed, with Bitcoin falling 3% from around $95,000 to $92,000, wiping out most of its early 2026 gains. Crypto markets saw a staggering $875 million in liquidations (forced closures of leveraged positions) within 24 hours, with 90% of those being long positions—meaning people betting on price increases got washed out.
Bitcoin is a risk asset—it thrives when investors feel adventurous and suffers when they get cautious. Nothing surprising here either.
The Dollar Weakened
Here’s the twist: the U.S. Dollar Index (which measures the greenback against a basket of major currencies) fell on Monday. The dollar dropped notably against the Japanese yen and weakened broadly against other major currencies.
This should feel counterintuitive. If this was a classic risk-off event, and the dollar is a classic safe haven, why did traders sell dollars?
Why This Time Was Different
The crucial difference is where the instability was coming from.
In previous trade tensions—Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs in April 2025, or the various U.S.-China trade escalations—the dollar initially weakened but often recovered quickly as traders decided either (a) the threats weren’t that serious, or (b) the U.S. economy would weather the storm better than others.
But the Greenland situation introduced a new variable: the United States itself appearing to be a source of unpredictable geopolitical risk rather than a stabilizing force.
And with that notion in mind, it’s kind of a no brainer as to why the dollar took a hit to start the week.
In other words, traders started asking: “If the U.S. is willing to threaten its closest military allies over a territorial demand that virtually no one considers realistic, what other unpredictable policy moves might be coming?” That uncertainty gets priced into U.S. assets.
The Safe Haven That Wasn’t
When traders sold dollars on Monday, where did they go instead?
- The Japanese yen strengthened as a classic safe haven
- The Swiss franc advanced as investors sought alternatives
- Gold hit record highs as the ultimate “no one’s currency” safe haven
- Even the euro, after an initial dip to seven-week lows, bounced back 0.26% as traders reassessed that maybe European stability was less at risk than American credibility
This signals that market players see this as an important recalibration in global risk perception.
What to Watch Next
For traders trying to navigate this new environment, several key developments will matter:
Davos Meetings This Week
President Trump is scheduled to address the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Wednesday. European leaders plan to use these face-to-face meetings to attempt diplomatic solutions before the February 1 tariff deadline. Markets will scrutinize every comment and body language for signs of de-escalation or further escalation.
The February 1 Deadline
Trump’s initial 10% tariff is set to take effect in less than two weeks. Some economists believe this deadline will likely be postponed as diplomatic efforts continue. But the fact that it’s even on the table represents a fundamental shift in U.S.-Europe relations.
Supreme Court Tariff Ruling
Separately, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on the legality of Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose tariffs. The president has expressed concern about this ruling: “If the Supreme Court rules against the United States of America on this National Security bonanza, WE’RE SCREWED!” he wrote on social media. A ruling against the administration could undermine the entire tariff threat—or force a serious constitutional confrontation.
Market Structure Changes
A 10% tariff could potentially reduce GDP across affected European countries, with Germany taking the biggest hit. But the indirect effects—loss of confidence, disrupted supply chains, and the potential fragmentation of Western trade relationships—could prove far more damaging than the direct economic impact.
The Bottom Line
The Greenland tariff crisis teaches several crucial lessons for new traders:
Safe havens aren’t permanent. An asset that worked as a refuge in past crises might not work in the next one—especially if the crisis originates from that asset’s home country. The dollar’s role as the world’s safe haven depends on continued confidence in U.S. policy stability.
Pay attention to the source of instability. When Russia invades Ukraine, buy dollars and Treasuries. When Washington threatens NATO allies with economic coercion over territorial demands, maybe don’t. The origin of the shock matters as much as the shock itself.
Markets can reprice entire narratives quickly. The idea that “the U.S. is always the safe haven” isn’t a law of physics—it’s a market consensus that can change when facts change. Monday’s trading showed that consensus shifting in real time.
Geopolitics increasingly equals economics. The line between traditional military/diplomatic conflicts and economic warfare has blurred almost completely. Tariffs, investment restrictions, and trade relationships are now weapons of statecraft, making them far less predictable than classic trade negotiations over comparative advantage.
Gold’s having a moment. When you can’t trust any government or central bank to behave predictably, the ancient safe haven that doesn’t rely on anyone’s promises looks increasingly attractive. That’s why gold keeps hitting new all-time highs.
For traders watching this unfold, the key insight is recognizing that we may be entering a period where traditional safe-haven relationships no longer hold. When the U.S. itself becomes a source of geopolitical uncertainty, the entire risk-on/risk-off playbook needs revision.
Welcome to 2026, where nothing is certain—not even certainty itself.
This article is for educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice. Trading involves substantial risk, and past performance is not indicative of future results. Always do your own research and consider consulting with a qualified financial advisor.
Interested in fundamental analysis made for newbies and how to pair it up with technical analysis to find high quality opportunities that may match your trading and risk management style? Check out our Premium membership for event trading guides, short-term strategies, weekly recaps and more!
BabyPips.com Annual Premium Members also get an exclusive 30% discount on the annual subscription for the first year on Tradezella–the top rated journaling app! ($120 in savings)! Click here for more info!
