Trump vs. Wall Street: What a 10% Cap Means for Markets

2026-01-14 16:48:00
Earlier this week, shares of America’s biggest banks took a nosedive after President Trump revived a campaign promise: capping credit card interest rates at 10% for one year.
For beginner traders watching financial stocks, this is a masterclass in how policy announcements can rattle markets—even ones that might never happen.
The Basics: What Trump Proposed
On Friday night, January 10, President Trump posted on Truth Social:
“Effective January 20, 2026, I, as President of the United States, am calling for a one-year cap on credit card interest rates of 10%.”
The date is significant—it’s the one-year anniversary of his second inauguration. Trump doubled down on Sunday, telling reporters that credit card companies had “really abused” consumers and that banks would be “in violation of the law” if they didn’t comply by January 20.
Here’s the problem: Trump didn’t explain how this would work.
Currently, the average credit card interest rate in America sits around 22.30%, according to Federal Reserve data. For cards with balances that aren’t paid off monthly, rates can climb as high as 27-30%.
For someone carrying the average balance of $7,000, current rates mean paying thousands in interest over just a few years. A 10% cap could theoretically save consumers an estimated $100 billion annually.
So why did bank stocks crash instead of rally on “consumer-friendly” news?
Why It Matters: The Market Reaction
Banks make enormous amounts of money from credit cards. According to Federal Reserve research, interest income accounts for about 80% of credit card profitability.
So this interest rate cap could slash large bank earnings by 5-18%. For card-only lenders like Capital One, it would be catastrophic. Credit card operations generated an estimated $25 billion in additional revenue for major issuers in 2023 just from rate increases over the previous decade.
Financial markets reacted immediately. Here’s what happened Monday:
Banks took major hits:
- Capital One: -6.8%
- Synchrony Financial: -8%
- Citigroup: -3.7%
- JPMorgan Chase: -2.5%
- American Express: -4.3%
The S&P 500 Banking Index dropped 1.4%—its sharpest decline in months.
Even airlines caught the fallout:
- Delta Air Lines: -2.4%
- United Airlines: -1.7%
Why airlines? Delta earns roughly $2 billion per quarter from American Express partnerships on co-branded credit cards. If banks cut those programs, companies with strong ties to credit cards rewards could see profits suffer.
Can Trump Actually Do This?
Here’s the catch: Trump can’t impose this unilaterally.
Under current law, the president lacks the authority to cap interest rates through executive action. The Consumer Financial Protection Act explicitly forbids the CFPB from setting rate limits. Trump would need Congress to pass legislation.
Senators Bernie Sanders and Josh Hawley introduced a bill for a 10% cap in February 2025, and Trump voiced support for related legislation.
But passing anything by January 20? In 6 days? Highly unlikely the way Congress moves.
The Industry Pushback
Wall Street isn’t taking this quietly. Banking trade groups, including the American Bankers Association and the Bank Policy Institute, fired back with a joint statement calling a 10% cap “devastating for millions of American families and small businesses.”
JPMorgan CFO Jeremy Barnum echoed that concern on the bank’s earnings call, warning the policy would likely backfire. Instead of lowering borrowing costs, he said it would shrink the supply of credit as banks pull back from riskier borrowers.
That’s the core industry argument. If lenders cannot price for risk, they stop lending to higher-risk customers altogether.
A study from the Electronic Payments Coalition claimed a 10% cap could force banks to close accounts for nearly 90% of cardholders, or about 175 million Americans. Lower credit borrowers would be hit hardest, potentially pushed toward payday lenders and other high-cost alternatives.
There’s precedent for that outcome. Arkansas caps interest rates at 17%, and research shows the policy has effectively cut lower-income residents off from mainstream credit.
Banks also point out that caps already exist in more targeted forms. The Military Lending Act limits rates to 36% for active-duty service members, and many credit unions cap rates at 18%. The industry argues that expanding these models makes more sense than a blanket 10% limit.
What’s Next: Possible Outcomes
- Voluntary concessions: Banks might offer limited 10% cap cards for prime borrowers or promotional rates to avoid legislation.
- Legislative compromise: Congress could pass a 25-36% cap instead—still a reduction, but workable. This has bipartisan support.
- Nothing happens: Without congressional action by January 20, Trump’s “deadline” passes, and this fades away.
- Full implementation (unlikely): If legislation passes, expect massive disruption, credit tightening, and the elimination of rewards programs.
Markets are currently pricing in scenarios 2 or 3—hence the selloff but not total panic.
Key Lessons for Traders
Policy uncertainty creates volatility. Trump’s Friday post wiped billions off bank valuations by Monday—all from a social media announcement with no implementation plan.
Follow the money, not headlines. The cap sounds consumer-friendly, but traders recognized it would destroy a major profit center. Understanding business models helps you anticipate reactions.
Sector correlations matter. Airlines don’t lend money, but their stocks dropped because their credit card partnerships would suffer. Always think second-order effects.
Diversification = resilience. Capital One (mostly credit cards) lost 6.8% while JPMorgan (diversified) lost 2.5%.
Political risk is real. Banks thought they had a friendly administration. This showed political winds shift fast, especially in election years.
The Bottom Line
Trump’s credit card rate cap proposal created immediate market chaos despite uncertain implementation prospects. Bank stocks sold off sharply, and even airlines felt ripple effects.
For traders, this proves words matter—especially from presidents. Even without legal authority, Trump’s announcement triggered billions in losses and forced the industry to scramble.
What to watch: The January 20 deadline arrives soon. If nothing happens, expect a relief rally in bank stocks. If banks announce concessions or Congress advances legislation, volatility continues.
The episode highlights how quickly policy proposals can reshape market sentiment when they threaten an entire industry’s profit center. As a trader, success means understanding not just what’s announced, but what’s legally and politically feasible—and positioning accordingly.



