2026-01-12 17:51:00
The U.S. Treasury will auction $39 billion of 10 year note of the top of the hour. The six-month average as of the major components will be compared to the actual results to determine relative strength or weakness of the auction. The 6 month averages shows:
- Tail 0.1 basis points
- Bid to cover 2.51X
- Directs 20.6%
- Indirects 69.5%
- Dealers 9.9%.
Current treasury yields are little changed:
- 2-year yield 3.540%, +0.1 basis points
- 5 year yield 3.057%, unchanged
- 10 year yield 4.177%, +0.6 basis points
- 30 year yield 4.86%, +0.7 basis points.
Understanding US Treasury auction components
-
WI (When-Issued) level – The yield (or price) where the new Treasury security trades in the market before the auction; it reflects real-time investor demand and expectations, and auctions that clear through the WI (lower yield, higher price) signal strong demand, while those that clear above the WI indicate weaker demand.
-
Tail – The difference between the auction’s high yield and the WI yield at the bidding deadline; a positive tail (auction yield higher than WI) shows buyers demanded a discount, signaling soft demand, while a stop-through (negative tail) reflects aggressive buying and strong demand.
-
Bid-to-Cover ratio – Total bids received divided by the amount offered; a higher ratio means more demand relative to supply, while a lower ratio signals weaker investor appetite for that maturity.
-
Direct bidders – Domestic investors (such as U.S. banks, pension funds, insurance companies, and asset managers) that submit bids directly to the Treasury; higher direct participation typically reflects strong real-money demand and longer-term investment interest.
-
Indirect bidders – Foreign central banks, international institutions, and overseas investors bidding through primary dealers; high indirect participation is often read as strong global demand for U.S. Treasuries and support for the dollar-based reserve system.
-
Dealers (primary dealers) – Banks required to bid at every auction and make markets in Treasuries; when dealer take-down is high, it means end-user demand was weaker and dealers had to absorb more supply, while low dealer take-down indicates strong investor demand from directs and indirects.
How traders use Treasury auction data in real time
-
WI vs. auction result is the first reaction trigger – Traders compare the high yield to the WI level within seconds; a stop-through usually sends yields lower and bond prices higher, while a tail pushes yields up and the dollar higher as traders price in weaker demand.
-
Tail size defines the strength of the signal – A 0–0.5 bp tail is noise, 1–2 bps is weak, and 3+ bps is a red flag that demand was meaningfully soft and supply was not absorbed easily.
-
Bid-to-cover tells whether buyers showed up – A rising BTC versus recent auctions confirms improving demand, while a falling BTC warns that investors are stepping back, especially dangerous in longer-dated maturities.
-
Indirect bidders show global appetite for U.S. debt – Strong indirect participation signals foreign central banks and global reserve managers are buying, which is bullish for Treasuries and supportive for risk assets; weak indirects often coincide with rising yields and a firmer dollar.
-
Direct bidders reflect “real money” conviction – High direct take-down means pension funds, insurers, and asset managers are committing capital, which tends to stabilize yields after the auction.
-
Dealers are the shock absorbers – When dealers are stuck with a large share, they typically hedge by selling futures or cash bonds, pushing yields higher after the auction; low dealer take-down means the market absorbed the supply cleanly.
-
Traders watch maturity-specific patterns – Weak 2-year auctions hit Fed-rate expectations, weak 10s hit mortgage rates and equities, and weak 30s hit inflation and fiscal-risk pricing.
-
The post-auction 5-minute window matters most – If yields can’t reverse after a weak auction, it confirms a real supply problem; if a bad print gets bought, it shows hidden demand was waiting.
This article was written by Greg Michalowski at investinglive.com.
