تكنلوجيا اليوم
2025-12-18 17:35:00
Cardano is signaling a fundamental shift from the network’s roots in academic research toward a commercially driven “operating system” model.
On Dec. 17, the Intersect Product Committee released a report titled “Vision 2030,” outlining a strict set of performance benchmarks intended to redefine how the market values the network.
Intersect, the member-based organization tasked with maintaining the network’s continuity, aims to secure Cardano’s position not just as a cryptocurrency but as critical digital infrastructure. The strategy explicitly moves away from vague adoption promises.
Instead, it commits the ecosystem to achieving Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), including 324 million annual transactions, 1 million monthly active wallets, and a Total Value Locked (TVL) of roughly $3 billion by the end of the decade.
This document marks a turning point as the blockchain network previously prioritized formal verification and peer-reviewed code.
However, the Vision 2030 pivots the focus entirely toward metrics that enterprise clients and institutional investors recognize: uptime, revenue, and capital efficiency.
Notably, these targets also illuminate the stark contrast between Cardano’s methodical approach and the explosive growth of its competitors, raising questions about whether “reliability” alone can close the gap with market leaders like Ethereum and Solana.
Cardano’s “operating system” vision
The core thesis of the Vision 2030 draft is that a Layer 1 blockchain must function with the reliability of an operating system rather than the volatility of a startup.
The committee explicitly rejects the “speed at all costs” narrative that drives competitors such as Solana and Sui. Instead, the document anchors the network’s success to a service-level reliability benchmark of 99.98% uptime.
The drafters defined this metric with unusual specificity, using a Poisson model with an expected block production time of 20 seconds.
Under this framework, the network classifies any five-minute interval without a block as a “meaningful failure event.”
So, Cardano’s goal is to eliminate these gaps entirely across six-epoch windows, providing the kind of statistical assurance that infrastructure buyers, such as banks or government agencies, require before deploying capital.
This reliability focus dictates the network’s capacity planning.
The roadmap targets a base layer throughput of roughly 27 million transactions per month. The authors acknowledge that this limit is intentional as the strategy designates the mainnet primarily for high-value settlement and control traffic.
It assumes that high-frequency volume, such as day trading or gaming, will migrate to Cardano-based “first-class” Layer 2 networks. These L2s will handle the computational load while anchoring their final security back to the mainnet.
However, this design choice highlights a significant divergence from the broader market. A target of 27 million monthly transactions is significantly lower than that of high-performance networks like Solana, which routinely processed 70 million transactions daily.
Nonetheless, supporters of the blockchain network argue that Cardano is the best option for high-value users willing to pay a premium for settlement certainty. They make this case even as rivals offer vastly superior throughput for mass-market applications.
Governance and treasury
Beyond technical specifications, Vision 2030 proposes a radical overhaul of how the ecosystem allocates capital.
The document introduces “Treasury Seasons,” a structured budgeting framework designed to impose fiscal discipline on the network’s decentralized treasury.
Under this new model, the ecosystem will no longer distribute grants based on open-ended proposals. Instead, the treasury will operate in batched public funding windows.
This strategy requires workstreams to justify their budget requests using the roadmap’s three core utility metrics: TVL impact, transaction volume contribution, and active wallet growth.
The Intersect Product Committee describes these KPIs as “gating factors.” If a project fails to move the needle on adoption or reliability during one season, the governance process empowers the community to throttle or terminate its funding in the next.
The draft positions this mechanism as a safeguard against “perpetual grant mode,” ensuring resources flow only to initiatives that deliver observable returns.
This financial restructuring extends to the roles within the ecosystem. The plan outlines specific incentives for Delegated Representatives (DReps), Stake Pool Operators (SPOs), and the Constitutional Committee.
It introduces “turnout-aware thresholds” for governance votes, a mechanism designed to prevent small, motivated minority groups from pushing through decisions that lack broad support.
By formalizing these checks and balances, the committee aims to offer institutions a governance log they can audit, mirroring the corporate governance structures found in public equities.
The revenue reality check
The document pairs its operational goals with a specific economic outlook.
The strategy outlines a path to financial sustainability in which protocol revenue—defined as transaction fees collected by the network—covers the costs of security and development. The authors aim to achieve at least 16 million ADA in annual protocol revenue by 2030.
This projection assumes that average transaction fees will stabilize around 0.05 ADA as volume scales to the 324 million annual target.
However, the report also includes a “scenario analysis” regarding the fiat value of that revenue. The document cites an “illustrative” ADA price of $5.00 to demonstrate the network’s potential earning power. At this valuation, the protocol would generate approximately $81 million in annual revenue.
While these figures offer a path to sustainability, they pale in comparison to the current economics of the market leader.
This year, Ethereum generated approximately $600 million in transaction fees alone, which is nearly six times what Cardano aims to earn in a full year by 2030.
Furthermore, the reliance on a $5.00 token price, which is a roughly 500% increase from ADA’s current price levels, suggests that the network’s business model remains heavily dependent on speculative asset appreciation rather than organic fee demand.
The risk of execution and L2 dependence
The roadmap concludes with a frank assessment of the risks involved in this transition.
The authors emphasize that “invisible” user experience improvements, such as fee abstraction and session keys, are prerequisites for hitting the 1 million active wallet target. They acknowledge that the current user journey is often too complex for the enterprise compliance use cases they intend to capture.
Furthermore, the strategy highlights the economic tension inherent in the Layer 2 model.
The document explicitly warns of value leakage, noting that as activity moves to L2s, the base chain risks becoming a low-revenue settlement layer. Notably, Ethereum has faced significant struggles with its own layer-2 networks.
To mitigate this, Intersect insists that future bridge designs and tokenomics must “route value back” to Layer 1.
The draft calls on Stake Pool Operators to expand their roles, suggesting they run infrastructure for these L2s and auxiliary services to capture value across the full technology stack.
Essentially, the Vision 2030 document represents a clear desire to professionalize Cardano. By setting hard targets for uptime, adoption, and revenue, the ecosystem is inviting the market to judge it on execution rather than philosophy.
The proposed “operating system” model offers a coherent path to relevance, even if the financial projections suggest the network has a steep hill to climb to catch the industry’s revenue giants.
