Crypto funding platform Unicoin has lastly hit again on the Securities and Change Fee’s fraud lawsuit after three months, accusing the company of distorting its regulatory statements to construct a case.
Unicoin advised a New York federal choose on Wednesday that the SEC’s lawsuit ought to be dismissed because it “plucks snippets of communications and distorts their which means and context; treats routine monetary projection and optimism as fraud; and ignores Unicoin’s sober warnings about danger.”
“Most bizarrely, the SEC twists Unicoin’s disclosures within the firm’s personal SEC filings and improperly recasts these disclosures as proof of deception,” it added.
In Could, the SEC sued Unicoin, its CEO Alex Konanykhin, board member Silvina Moschini and former funding chief Alex Dominguez, alleging they raised $100 million by means of deceptive buyers about certificates that conveyed rights to obtain Unicoin tokens and inventory.
SEC wants increased customary of proof, Unicoin says
Unicoin argued that the SEC had cobbled collectively its claims and its allegation that the corporate violated securities legal guidelines wanted additional proof.
“Securities fraud calls for extra. It requires a false assertion, made with scienter, that cheap buyers would have relied on,” it wrote. “The place, as right here, the very dangers the SEC identifies had been disclosed brazenly and repeatedly, these parts can’t be met.”
It argued the SEC’s lawsuit was a “shotgun pleading” that didn’t put ahead a motive for Unicoin’s alleged actions and relied on circumstantial proof, “semantics and mischaracterizations of statements taken wholly out of context.”
SEC says Unicoin misled over tokens, certificates
The SEC alleged that Unicoin made deceptive statements by saying that billions of {dollars} value of real-world property — equivalent to actual property and fairness in pre-IPO firms — would again its upcoming token and rights certificates.
The regulator claimed that in actuality, the property had been value a fraction of what it claimed and the corporate had misrepresented its monetary scenario.
The company alleged that Unicoin mentioned it offered greater than $3 billion in rights certificates when the corporate had solely offered $110 million, and falsely marketed the tokens and certificates as SEC-registered.
Unicoin fires again at SEC claims
In its submitting, Unicoin argued that the SEC’s declare that it misled buyers concerning the backing of its token relied on statements “taken wholly out of context,” as executives had mentioned the corporate was asset-backed, not its upcoming tokens.
Associated: SEC to concentrate on ‘clear’ crypto laws after Ripple case: Atkins
The place executives had mentioned the token was asset-backed, Unicoin argued that “at no level did any Defendant declare that unicoins would perform as a totally collateralized funding.”
It added that the tokens hadn’t been created but, and the SEC was attempting to pin it for “forward-looking expressions of optimism.”
Unicoin mentioned the SEC’s lawsuit had stopped it from having the ability to mint tokens and again them with property, whereas its lawsuit appears to carry it liable “for failing to create tokens which can be absolutely collateralized by real-world property.”
It added that the SEC had conflated the deal and property worth of the corporate’s actual property transactions, a few of which it claimed to have disclosed to buyers, had been nonetheless within the strategy of closing.
Unicoin requested the courtroom to dismiss the SEC’s lawsuit with prejudice, which means it will be stopped from re-filing the grievance.
Journal: SEC’s U-turn on crypto leaves key questions unanswered
