Enterprise capital agency Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) is asking on US lawmakers to revise a draft crypto regulation invoice, warning that the proposed framework might open harmful loopholes and undermine investor protections.
In a Thursday open letter to the US Senate Banking Committee, the funding agency means that the regulators ought to shut loopholes within the draft crypto laws. The letter is a response to the dialogue draft launched in late July.
The dialogue draft in query builds on the twenty first Century Monetary Innovation and Know-how Act (CLARITY Act) and seeks trade enter on the continued crypto regulation. A16z factors to the definition of ancillary belongings, referring to tokens offered with an funding contract that give consumers no fairness, dividend or governance rights.
“The ancillary asset assemble shouldn’t function the inspiration for laws with out important modifications,” the letter reads.
Associated: A16z doubles down on LayerZero with $55M funding
A16z pushes for “digital commodity” mannequin
A16z mentioned the present strategy fails to resolve the core points going through crypto markets and can be incompatible with the Howey check, the long-standing authorized benchmark for outlining securities.
The funding agency mentioned this strategy “won’t resolve the challenges going through crypto market members.” As a substitute, the agency recommends adopting the CLARITY Act’s narrower “digital commodity” framework, which it says would offer larger certainty whereas preserving regulatory simplicity.
A16z additionally claimed that “the Howey check stays a essential element of US securities legislation” and may stay in its present kind. Its advised answer is to “codify a modernized utility suited to ancillary belongings.”
It described the proposed adjustments to the Howey check as “pointless—and harmful—as a result of it seeks to rewrite Howey in a method that departs from settled legislation and undermines investor protections”:
“These adjustments will not be merely problematic—they’re incompatible with the broader structure of U.S. securities legislation.“
Insider gross sales needs to be restricted
A16z additionally mentioned that making use of securities legislation to main transactions and commodity rules for secondary transactions creates a loophole, permitting issuers to promote ancillary belongings to insiders below exemptions, after which resell within the public market with out falling below securities rules.
As an answer, the funding agency advised requiring the initiatives to attain decentralization by eliminating mechanisms of management. Making use of switch restrictions by way of these means “can shut loopholes that might in any other case come up,” the letter states.
In response to a16z, this might additionally forestall insider enrichment on the expense of public buyers and be sure that the excellence between the first and secondary markets stays significant:
“As soon as management is relinquished and the undertaking is decentralized, these restrictions ought to fall away, because the asset’s belief dependencies now resemble these of a commodity.“
Associated: Trump plans to choose a16z head of coverage Brian Quintenz as CFTC chair: Report
A control-based decentralization framework
The agency means that regulators ought to undertake a control-based decentralization framework, which it says “is the suitable strategy to consider the evolution of an ancillary asset’s danger profile.”
The letter explains that this strategy “needs to be centered on whether or not any get together retains unilateral authority—operational, financial, or governance—over the blockchain system.” This, in line with the funding agency, needs to be thought of when making use of the Howey check:
“Howey shouldn’t be deserted. As a substitute, Congress ought to codify the rules underlying Howey for belongings below a control-based decentralization framework.”
Defend the plumbers, not the pipes
A16z additional says that the US Securities and Change Fee’s (SEC) previous deal with the “efforts of others” side of the Howey check “has created important perverse incentives.”
It claims this results in decrease transparency, exposes customers to undisclosed dangers and stalls innovation. The letter additionally means that being concerned with the expertise on the foundation of crypto shouldn’t infringe on securities legislation.
“Laws ought to make clear that core expertise capabilities obligatory for the operation of decentralized blockchain methods — akin to working consensus algorithms, mining, staking, and executing sensible contracts — don’t, in and of themselves, represent regulated monetary exercise below U.S. securities or commodities legal guidelines,” the agency mentioned.
Journal: How crypto legal guidelines are altering internationally in 2025
